FMN News Brief · Events
Apple’s Search for More Memory Chips Draws Bipartisan Scrutiny
FMN AUDIO
Listen to this article
Audio playback is not available in this browser.
Article audio is stopped.

Apple is considering Chinese suppliers as it seeks more memory chips for its products, a move that has prompted objections from two prominent U.S. senators. The company has historically obtained RAM for its Apple silicon chips from Samsung, South Korea’s SK Hynix and Micron. Growing demand from artificial intelligence data centers has tightened supplies, however, pushing Apple to explore additional sources as it works to maintain production and control costs.
The suppliers under consideration reportedly include ChangXin Memory Technologies, known as CXMT, and Yangtze Memory Technologies Co., or YMTC. The Pentagon has identified both companies as having links to China’s military, while YMTC is also on the U.S. Entity List. That designation places restrictions on certain trade involving the company because of U.S. national security concerns. The RAM under discussion has not been tested for Apple’s particular needs, leaving questions about its reliability and compatibility. The report also raised the possibility that sourcing components from the companies could complicate government use of Apple devices, though no such restriction has been announced.
Sens. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., have urged Apple to stop lobbying the Trump administration in support of purchases from CXMT and YMTC. They cited the manufacturers’ reported connections to the Chinese military and warned that greater reliance on Chinese production could work against efforts to restore manufacturing jobs in the United States. The senators asked Apple to end its pursuit of the suppliers by August 21, but the report said the company had made no final decision. Apple would not necessarily need federal approval to buy the chips, particularly for devices sold outside the United States. Still, restrictions surrounding the suppliers could create regulatory and security complications. Any deal also may offer limited savings because suppliers facing heavy demand could charge higher prices. For families and other consumers who depend on Apple phones, computers and tablets, the dispute centers on whether the company can secure enough memory without introducing concerns about product reliability, future availability or use in government settings.
Editorial note: FMN prepared this summary from TheBlaze's August 9, 2026 report and independently structured it for readers.

